Talk:Transgender ideology - Revision history

Technician at 16:29, 12 October 2022

2022-10-12T16:29:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 12 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)		This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)

	: {{reply to\|Mediator64}} I don't know if you're still around but: I've reverted a lot of the changes you made, partly because I found them to be non-factual / biased in favor of the trans perspective, but also partly because I simply didn't have the time to pick apart justified changes/corrections from parts that have such bias. If I find time I'll take another look at the changes you had made and try to make sure that the article is factual and well-cited, but please note the following, which may have been unclear at the time you made the changes (it's explained on the homepage): The FeministWiki is not trying to offer a neutral point of view, it's explicitly pro-classical/radical feminism. This means that, if a passage in a FeministWiki article is clearly conjecture, opinion, philosophy, guesswork, etc., then it's allowed to be biased in favor of radical feminist perspectives. (Although it's best if feminist authors are cited to prove that it actually is their position, and not made up by FeministWiki editors.) Only when a matter-of-fact claim is made, then it's important to provide concrete objective evidence in the form of citations. [[User:Technician\|Technician]] ([[User talk:Technician\|talk]]) 18:27, 12 October 2022 (CEST)		: {{reply to\|Mediator64}} I don't know if you're still around but: I've reverted a lot of the changes you made, partly because I found them to be non-factual / biased in favor of the trans perspective, but also partly because I simply didn't have the time to pick apart justified changes/corrections from parts that have such bias. If I find time I'll take another look at the changes you had made and try to make sure that the article is factual and well-cited, but please note the following, which may have been unclear at the time you made the changes (it's explained on the homepage): The FeministWiki is not trying to offer a neutral point of view, it's explicitly pro-classical/radical feminism. This means that, if a passage in a FeministWiki article is clearly conjecture, opinion, philosophy, guesswork, etc., then it's allowed to be biased in favor of radical feminist perspectives. (Although it's best if feminist authors are cited to prove that it actually is their position, and not made up by FeministWiki editors.) Only when a matter-of-fact claim is made, then it's important to provide concrete objective evidence in the form of citations. For example the statements about minors receiving mastectomies and genital surgeries that I just added to the page must be cited (as they are, via Reuters), but conjecture on why trans activism seems connected to "sex work" activism doesn't require evidence, so long as the wording makes it clear that it's conjecture. [[User:Technician\|Technician]] ([[User talk:Technician\|talk]]) 18:27, 12 October 2022 (CEST)

Technician at 16:27, 12 October 2022

2022-10-12T16:27:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 12 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)		This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)

	: {{reply to\|Mediator64}} I don't know if you're still around but: I've reverted a lot of the changes you made, partly because I found them to be non-factual / biased in favor of the trans perspective, but also partly because I simply didn't have the time to pick apart justified changes/corrections from parts that have such bias. If I find time I'll take another look at the changes you had made and try to make sure that the article is factual and well-cited, but please note the following, which may have been unclear at the time you made the changes (it's explained on the homepage): The FeministWiki is not trying to offer a neutral point of view, it's explicitly pro-classical/radical feminism. This means that, if a passage in a FeministWiki article is clearly conjecture, opinion, philosophy, guesswork, etc., then it's allowed to be biased in favor of radical feminist perspectives. (Although it's best if feminist authors are cited to prove that it actually is their position, and not made up by FeministWiki editors.) Only when a matter-of-fact claim is made, then it's important to provide concrete objective evidence in the form of citations.		: {{reply to\|Mediator64}} I don't know if you're still around but: I've reverted a lot of the changes you made, partly because I found them to be non-factual / biased in favor of the trans perspective, but also partly because I simply didn't have the time to pick apart justified changes/corrections from parts that have such bias. If I find time I'll take another look at the changes you had made and try to make sure that the article is factual and well-cited, but please note the following, which may have been unclear at the time you made the changes (it's explained on the homepage): The FeministWiki is not trying to offer a neutral point of view, it's explicitly pro-classical/radical feminism. This means that, if a passage in a FeministWiki article is clearly conjecture, opinion, philosophy, guesswork, etc., then it's allowed to be biased in favor of radical feminist perspectives. (Although it's best if feminist authors are cited to prove that it actually is their position, and not made up by FeministWiki editors.) Only when a matter-of-fact claim is made, then it's important to provide concrete objective evidence in the form of citations. [[User:Technician\|Technician]] ([[User talk:Technician\|talk]]) 18:27, 12 October 2022 (CEST)

Technician at 16:26, 12 October 2022

2022-10-12T16:26:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 12 October 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)		This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)

			: {{reply to\|Mediator64}} I don't know if you're still around but: I've reverted a lot of the changes you made, partly because I found them to be non-factual / biased in favor of the trans perspective, but also partly because I simply didn't have the time to pick apart justified changes/corrections from parts that have such bias. If I find time I'll take another look at the changes you had made and try to make sure that the article is factual and well-cited, but please note the following, which may have been unclear at the time you made the changes (it's explained on the homepage): The FeministWiki is not trying to offer a neutral point of view, it's explicitly pro-classical/radical feminism. This means that, if a passage in a FeministWiki article is clearly conjecture, opinion, philosophy, guesswork, etc., then it's allowed to be biased in favor of radical feminist perspectives. (Although it's best if feminist authors are cited to prove that it actually is their position, and not made up by FeministWiki editors.) Only when a matter-of-fact claim is made, then it's important to provide concrete objective evidence in the form of citations.

Mediator64 at 18:09, 17 February 2021

2021-02-17T18:09:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:09, 17 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points.[[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)		This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points. [[User:Mediator64\|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64\|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)

Mediator64: Created talk page

2021-02-17T18:08:52Z

Created talk page

New page

This article holds a lot of misinformation and lacks sources for many of its statements. I am going to revise it to more accurately demonstrate its talking points.[[User:Mediator64|Mediator64]] ([[User talk:Mediator64|talk]]) 19:08, 17 February 2021 (CET)